Milky oil and alcohol
07-28-2011, 10:47 AM
#62
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer, AB Canada
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by shawnp
Just out of curiousity, did you run the valves to check that they were set properly?
0.024 on both the intake and exhaust, as per the cam card from Comp.
08-01-2011, 07:34 PM
#63
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Coldwater, MI
Posts: 2,998
Whats the cam specs besides lift ? and where did the actually install it at ?
For it to have that much crank case pressure you'd have to have slim to no vacuum. They are is major issues there, and a good amount of power there also.
For it to have that much crank case pressure you'd have to have slim to no vacuum. They are is major issues there, and a good amount of power there also.
08-12-2011, 07:41 AM
#64
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer, AB Canada
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by hammertime
Whats the cam specs besides lift ? and where did the actually install it at ?
For it to have that much crank case pressure you'd have to have slim to no vacuum. They are is major issues there, and a good amount of power there also.
For it to have that much crank case pressure you'd have to have slim to no vacuum. They are is major issues there, and a good amount of power there also.
08-12-2011, 07:08 PM
#65
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Coldwater, MI
Posts: 2,998
Originally Posted by kod99
Originally Posted by hammertime
Whats the cam specs besides lift ? and where did the actually install it at ?
For it to have that much crank case pressure you'd have to have slim to no vacuum. They are is major issues there, and a good amount of power there also.
For it to have that much crank case pressure you'd have to have slim to no vacuum. They are is major issues there, and a good amount of power there also.
08-13-2011, 06:13 AM
#66
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer, AB Canada
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by hammertime
Originally Posted by kod99
Originally Posted by hammertime
Whats the cam specs besides lift ? and where did the actually install it at ?
For it to have that much crank case pressure you'd have to have slim to no vacuum. They are is major issues there, and a good amount of power there also.
For it to have that much crank case pressure you'd have to have slim to no vacuum. They are is major issues there, and a good amount of power there also.
08-13-2011, 07:14 AM
#67
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer, AB Canada
Posts: 213
Another interesting fact is that, on the first three dyno pulls on race gas, the crankcase btween 8 and 10 inches of vacuum.
It was only when I switched to alcohol that I started to build crankcase pressure. At times, as much as 29 psi.
It was only when I switched to alcohol that I started to build crankcase pressure. At times, as much as 29 psi.
08-13-2011, 09:14 AM
#69
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer, AB Canada
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by hammertime
Says its not there, did u delete it ?
I assume you havent raced it yet ?
I assume you havent raced it yet ?
First runs on the new engine tomorrow.
Here it is again:
08-13-2011, 09:25 AM
#70
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer, AB Canada
Posts: 213
Here is a link to the dyno pulls:
The manifold pressure is actually the crankcase pressure.
The file name indicates the run number. The forst three runs were on gas, the remainder on alcohol.
http://s205.photobucket.com/albums/b...Dyno%20Sheets/
The manifold pressure is actually the crankcase pressure.
The file name indicates the run number. The forst three runs were on gas, the remainder on alcohol.
http://s205.photobucket.com/albums/b...Dyno%20Sheets/