Trivia

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-15-2010, 04:46 PM
  #121  
Harbone
Moderator
RACING JUNKIE
 
Harbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,042
Default

1934 chrysler airflow???
__________________
Chris

As close to "Normal" as I can get...
Harbone is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:47 PM
  #122  
fla1976
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
fla1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,523
Default

1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt
fla1976 is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:49 PM
  #123  
ajk
Senior Member
DYNO OPERATOR
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wi
Posts: 522
Default

The Airflow is correct. All yours
ajk is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:53 PM
  #124  
Harbone
Moderator
RACING JUNKIE
 
Harbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,042
Default

besides the obvious trim differences between a 67 and a 68 camaro, there was a issue with the rear suspension on the 67 camaro that became a recall and then was redesign in 68. so first what was the recall and what did it involve and second what was redesigned in 68 to solve the problem :?:
__________________
Chris

As close to "Normal" as I can get...
Harbone is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:56 PM
  #125  
dragonmaster093
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: kingsport tn
Posts: 1,729
Default

srings and use of slapper bar
dragonmaster093 is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:58 PM
  #126  
Harbone
Moderator
RACING JUNKIE
 
Harbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,042
Default

Originally Posted by dragonmaster093
srings and use of slapper bar
close but it was a design change...
__________________
Chris

As close to "Normal" as I can get...
Harbone is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:01 PM
  #127  
dragonmaster093
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: kingsport tn
Posts: 1,729
Default

spring perches?
dragonmaster093 is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:03 PM
  #128  
Harbone
Moderator
RACING JUNKIE
 
Harbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,042
Default

nope...
__________________
Chris

As close to "Normal" as I can get...
Harbone is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:05 PM
  #129  
DirkaDirka
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
DirkaDirka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 1,922
Default

The shock absorber mounting was staggered to resolve wheel hop issues and higher performance models received multi-leaf rear springs instead of single-leaf units
DirkaDirka is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:07 PM
  #130  
Harbone
Moderator
RACING JUNKIE
 
Harbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,042
Default

Originally Posted by DirkaDirka
The shock absorber mounting was staggered to resolve wheel hop issues and higher performance models received multi-leaf rear springs instead of single-leaf units
ding ding ding!!! the original shocks were mounted on the same side of the axle and the cars had horrible wheel hop, to solve the problem GM had a recall to mount a torque arm/traction bar on the right side to alleviate the problem, in 68 they staggered the shocks and went to multi leaf and the problem was solved.
you are up dennis!
__________________
Chris

As close to "Normal" as I can get...
Harbone is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -