Originally Posted by Scorpion1110

This thread continues to get interesting-

I would tend to agree that there are two separate issues; a bank wire purportedly sent twice, and a vehicle which may or may not have been misrepresented.

If the bank indeed wired funds twice I find it hard to believe they would hold the account of sender responsible-I do believe that there are legal methods to pursue this issue between the banks. I have never had it happen so I can not offer anything further on that.

As to the vehicle being misrepresented, there should be some kind of documentation to support or dispute, possibly an ad, pics etc. Withhout documentation then its one's word against another.

Motormanracer1, your post is particularly thorough and I see you are a recent member actually today-It makes one wonder exactly what your relationship is to this issue-but perhaps you just happened upon this thread. Set up a profile if you already have not-it will help you get acquainted with a very decent group of folks. BTW, you wouldnt be Mr. Sellers or Mr. Tokarz would you?

BTW, a word to posters on this forum, if you wish to avoid the issues associated with slander or libel, frame your commentary as an opinion (which it is initially anyway). An opinion stated as such is not slander or libel- Its a bit of insurance that will annoy the legal types.

As always, my humble opinion.



I know your sharp as a tack Scorpion1110 but motormanracer1 sounds like a lawyer in training.

Oh almost forgot, JMO

><Cp

Later